The correct answers are A. Build an approval process that requires unanimous approval from the manager and VP of Sales and D. Create a flow that submits the record for an approval process.
The requirement is not just to notify users or block the change. The manager and VP of Sales must review the close-date delay. Salesforce approval processes are designed to automate how records are approved, including approval steps, approvers, and approval/rejection actions.
A is correct because an approval process can route the Opportunity to the manager and VP of Sales for approval. Requiring unanimous approval ensures both reviewers must approve the delayed close date.
D is correct because a record-triggered flow can detect when the Opportunity Close Date changes and is delayed by more than 60 days, then use the Submit for Approval action. Salesforce Flow supports prior-value/change logic in record-triggered flows, and Salesforce documents the Flow Submit for Approval action.
Why others are incorrect:
B is incorrect because a validation rule blocks saving the record. It does not allow manager/VP review.
C is incorrect because a formula field and email alert do not create an approval review process, and the stated logic does not satisfy the approval requirement.
===========
