Universal Containers (UC) has multiple development teams that work on separate streams of work, with...

The correct selection is A. GitHub Flow uses short-lived feature branches around an always-deployable mainline and is suitable when teams have separate work streams and delivery dates. Each stream can be integrated through pull requests without forcing unfinished work into a common trunk prematurely. From a release perspective, approved functionality must be isolated from unfinished work and promoted through a predictable, auditable path. Release calendars, validation, stakeholder approval, rollback planning, and branch discipline reduce the risk that a technically correct change becomes an operational failure during production promotion. The remaining choices either bypass release governance, delay an urgent correction unnecessarily, or fail to isolate approved production content from work that is still in progress. For this scenario, the decisive point is therefore the platform behavior represented by the selected option (A. GitHub flow). Applying that rule consistently keeps the implementation aligned with Salesforce-supported lifecycle practices and makes the resulting change easier to review, validate, and operate across environments.

Study Guide reference: Releasing — release management; branching and hotfixes; production readiness; rollback strategy; seasonal releases; approvals.