Universal Containers (UC) development team is developing a managed package for AppExchange.

The correct selection is A. Checkmarx findings must be reviewed individually. Real vulnerabilities should be remediated; legitimate false positives should be documented with a technical justification and included in the AppExchange security-review submission rather than ignored or mechanically changed simply to produce a zero-warning report. From a build perspective, the implementation should be source-driven, reviewable, automatable, and modular. Engineering controls such as version control, package boundaries, static analysis, coding standards, and isolated development environments reduce defects early and make changes easier to understand, test, and promote. The alternatives do not create the same repeatable engineering control: they either postpone defect detection, couple teams unnecessarily, or bypass the package/source model that should govern the change. For this scenario, the decisive point is therefore the platform behavior represented by the selected option (A. Review the Checkmarx errors. If there is no need to fix, mark them as false positive and attach explanation, then submit.). Applying that rule consistently keeps the implementation aligned with Salesforce-supported lifecycle practices and makes the resulting change easier to review, validate, and operate across environments.

Study Guide reference: Building — Salesforce DX; package development; coding standards; static analysis; source control; secure development.