Traditional inverters use the manual string shutdown solution to disconnect equipment internal fault or PV...

The exact extract says: “Traditional inverters use the manual string shutdown solution to disconnect equipment internal fault or PV modules fault.” The correct answer is True. The point of this question is the contrast between a traditional DC-side protection method and Huawei’s smarter active-disconnection approach. In a traditional PV inverter architecture, when a string fault, module-side issue, or equipment-side fault occurs, isolation often depends on manual disconnection through DC switches, string-level fuse/combiner design, or onsite service action. That process is slower and less granular than intelligent string-level or module-level shutdown. Huawei’s newer C & I safety positioning emphasizes active DC-side fault protection, intelligent string disconnection, and faster shutdown to reduce fire and equipment-damage risks. So the statement is correct when describing the traditional approach: it depends on manual string shutdown rather than automatic intelligent isolation. Huawei’s solution is designed to improve this by enabling faster, more precise DC-side fault response. References: Huawei C & I Smart PV safety material; Huawei AFCI and active-safety materials.