The correlation between ESG ratings of issuers by different ESG rating providers tends to be lower compared to the correlation between credit ratings of issuers by different credit rating providers.
1. ESG Ratings Variability: ESG rating providers often use different methodologies, criteria, and weightings to assess companies' ESG performance. This can lead to significant variations in the ratings assigned to the same issuer by different ESG rating providers. Factors such as the choice of indicators, data sources, and the subjective nature of some ESG criteria contribute to these differences.
2. Credit Ratings Consistency: In contrast, credit rating providers like Moody's, S&P, and Fitch use more standardized and widely accepted methodologies to assess credit risk. While there may still be some variation, the correlation between credit ratings from different providers is generally higher because they follow similar fundamental principles and financial metrics in their assessments.
3. Empirical Studies: Empirical studies have shown that the correlation between ESG ratings from different providers is lower compared to the correlation between credit ratings. This is due to the subjective and evolving nature of ESG criteria versus the more established and quantitative nature of credit risk assessment.
References from CFA ESG Investing:
ESG Ratings Methodologies: The CFA Institute discusses the differences in methodologies used by various ESG rating providers and the resulting variability in ratings. Understanding these differences is crucial for investors when interpreting and using ESG ratings.
Credit Rating Consistency: The CFA curriculum highlights the higher consistency and correlation between credit ratings from different providers, which is attributed to the standardized approaches used in credit risk assessment.
======
