The correct answer is B. Client overstating value of stolen items because moral hazard relates to the character, honesty, or behaviour of the insured that increases the likelihood or severity of loss. In insurance, moral hazard is not about the physical condition of the property or the surrounding environment. Instead, it concerns attitudes or actions such as dishonesty, fraud, exaggeration of claims, intentional loss, or indifference to the insurer’s interests.
A client who overstates the value of stolen items is creating a dishonest claims situation , which is a classic example of moral hazard. This kind of behaviour affects underwriting and claims handling because it suggests the insured may try to gain financially from the insurance contract beyond proper indemnification.
The other options are examples of physical hazard , not moral hazard. A. Poor wiring in a home is a physical condition that increases the chance of fire. C. Use of asbestos insulation is also a physical condition or construction feature that may affect risk. D. High traffic area prone to collisions is an external exposure hazard connected to location and frequency of accidents.
From a RIBO perspective, this question tests the broker’s ability to distinguish between moral hazards and physical hazards . That distinction is important when assessing risk, identifying underwriting concerns, and recognizing possible fraud indicators.
