In an authorized physical assessment, the goal is to test physical security controls. Tailgating is a common and effective technique in such scenarios. Here’s why option B is correct:
Tailgating: This involves following an authorized person into a secure area without proper credentials. During busy times, it’s easier to blend in and gain access without being noticed. It tests the effectiveness of physical access controls and security personnel.
Cloning Badge Information: This can be effective but requires proximity to employees and specialized equipment, making it more complex and time-consuming.
Picking Locks: This is a more invasive technique that carries higher risk and is less stealthy compared to tailgating.
Dropping USB Devices: This tests employee awareness and response to malicious devices but does not directly test physical access controls.
References from Pentest:
Writeup HTB: Demonstrates the effectiveness of social engineering and tailgating techniques in bypassing physical security measures.
Forge HTB: Highlights the use of non-invasive methods like tailgating to test physical security without causing damage or raising alarms.
Conclusion:
Option B, tailgating into the facility during a busy time, is the best attack plan to gain access to the facility in an authorized physical assessment.
======
