The best option for optimizing the data processing pipeline for run time and compute resources utilization is to embed the augmentation functions dynamically in the tf.Data pipeline. This option has the following advantages:
It allows the data augmentation to be performed on the fly, without creating or storing additional copies of the data. This saves storage space and reduces the data transfer time.
It leverages the parallelism and performance of the tf.Data API, which can efficiently apply the augmentation functions to multiple batches of data in parallel, using multiple CPU cores or GPU devices. The tf.Data API also supports various optimization techniques, such as caching, prefetching, and autotuning, to improve the data processing speed and reduce the latency.
It integrates seamlessly with the TensorFlow and Keras models, which can consume the tf.Data datasets as inputs for training and evaluation. The tf.Data API also supports various data formats, such as images, text, audio, and video, and various data sources, such as files, databases, and web services.
The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:
Option B: Embedding the augmentation functions dynamically as part of Keras generators introduces some limitations and overhead. Keras generators are Python generators that yield batches of data for training or evaluation. However, Keras generators are not compatible with the tf.distribute API, which is used to distribute the training across multiple devices or machines. Moreover, Keras generators are not as efficient or scalable as the tf.Data API, as they run on a single Python thread and do not support parallelism or optimization techniques.
Option C: Using Dataflow to create all possible augmentations, and store them as TFRecords introduces additional complexity and cost. Dataflow is a fully managed service that runs Apache Beam pipelines for data processing and transformation. However, using Dataflow to create all possible augmentations requires generating and storing a large number of augmented images, which can consume a lot of storage space and incur storage and network costs. Moreover, using Dataflow to create the augmentations requires writing and deploying a separate Dataflow pipeline, which can be tedious and time-consuming.
Option D: Using Dataflow to create the augmentations dynamically per training run, and stage them as TFRecords introduces additional complexity and latency. Dataflow is a fully managed service that runs Apache Beam pipelines for data processing and transformation. However, using Dataflow to create the augmentations dynamically per training run requires running a Dataflow pipeline every time the model is trained, which can introduce latency and delay the training process. Moreover, using Dataflow to create the augmentations requires writing and deploying a separate Dataflow pipeline, which can be tedious and time-consuming.
References:
[tf.data: Build TensorFlow input pipelines]
[Image augmentation | TensorFlow Core]
[Dataflow documentation]
