When faced with a situation where a vice president from a different product line brings a valid concern during the release of an important product, the project manager should have proactively identified the vice president as a stakeholder. Here’s why:
1.Stakeholder Identification:
oIdentifying stakeholders is a critical step in project management.
oStakeholders include anyone who has an interest in or can be affected by the project.
oThe vice president’s involvement in the project, even if not previously engaged, makes them a relevant stakeholder.
2.Benefits of Identifying Stakeholders:
oRecognizing the vice president as a stakeholder allows the project manager to consider their concerns and priorities.
oIt facilitates effective communication and collaboration throughout the project lifecycle.
oStakeholder engagement ensures that all relevant perspectives are considered.
3.Risk Mitigation:
oBy identifying the vice president as a stakeholder early on, the project manager could have addressed their concerns proactively.
oRecording the concerns in the risk register (Option B) is also valuable, but stakeholder identification comes first.
4.Project Boundaries and Scope:
oSharing project boundaries and scope (Option D) is essential, but it doesn’t directly address the vice president’s concerns.
oEscalating dissent to top management (Option C) should be a last resort after attempting to resolve issues at lower levels.
In summary, identifying the vice president as a stakeholder would have allowed the project manager to engage them effectively, address their concerns, and prevent delays in the product release.
[References:, •[Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management, , , , ]
