What should the team have done to improve retrospective outcomes?
A.
Invited subject matter experts (SMEs)
B.
Conducted problem detection to determine root causes
C.
Measured and reported the outcome of improvement actions to the team
D.
Kept track of all current issues in a log and then reviewed their progress at the end of every iteration
The Answer Is:
B
This question includes an explanation.
Explanation:
When issuesrecur across multiple iterations, it’s a strong indication that theroot cause has not been addressed. ThePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.6 Retrospectives)andMike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 7: Continuous Improvement)recommend performingroot cause analysistechniques (e.g., 5 Whys, Fishbone diagram) to ensure that the true source of recurring problems is uncovered and resolved.
Option Bis correct: identifying root causes is essential to sustainable improvements.
Option Amay help but doesn’t address the underlying team-level process.
Option Cis usefulaftera solution is implemented but not the priority when the cause is unknown.
Option Dis helpful for tracking, but again, ineffective if the root cause is unidentified.
PMI-ACP PDF/Engine
Printable Format
Value of Money
100% Pass Assurance
Verified Answers
Researched by Industry Experts
Based on Real Exams Scenarios
100% Real Questions
Get 60% Discount on All Products,
Use Coupon: "8w52ceb345"