The ABC organization has a financial application built on Pega Platform™.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Pega’s deployment and testing best practices, as outlined in Pega Academy’sDeployment Missionand thePega Certified Lead System Architect Study Guide, emphasize quality control through governance processes like compliance scoring and check-in approvals, especially for sensitive applications with large development teams.

Option A (Incorrect): Dedicating a separate ruleset for each team organizes development but does not inherently enforce quality check-in gates. It supports modularity but lacks direct quality assurance, per theRuleset Managementmodule.

Option B (Incorrect): Using separate ruleset versions supports versioning but does not ensure quality through review or compliance checks. It is aconfiguration practice, not a quality gate, as noted in theApplication Developmentguidelines.

Option C (Correct): Rejecting deployments to higher environments (e.g., QA, production) if the compliance score falls below a Center of Excellence threshold ensures that only high-quality code progresses. Pega’s Guardrail Compliance Score evaluates adherence to best practices, making this a robust quality gate, as documented in theDeployment Pipelinemodule.

Option D (Correct): Implementing a rule check-in approval process requires developers to submit rules for review before check-in, ensuring code quality through peer or senior developer oversight. This is a standard governance practice in Pega, per theRule Check-in Approvalsection in Pega Community.