If there is a conflict between a policy provision and state statutes the policy

Insurance policies are contracts, but they are also subject to state insurance laws and regulations . When a policy provision conflicts with a state statute, the law controls because statutory requirements set the minimum standards that insurers must follow in that state. Therefore, the policy must be interpreted and administered so it meets at least the minimum statute requirements , even if the printed policy language is more restrictive. In practice, this means a conflicting provision is treated as amended by operation of law to conform to state requirements.

This rule protects consumers by ensuring insurers cannot contract around mandated provisions such as required benefits, mandated grace periods, claim procedures, or required notices. It also supports uniformity and regulatory oversight, since insurers must file forms and comply with state mandates as a condition of doing business.

Option A is not correct because commissioner review does not “fix” conflicts after the fact; the controlling principle is statutory compliance. Option C is incorrect because nonconforming provisions cannot simply stand as written. Option D is incorrect because an insurance contract does not override state law.