You are expanding a DGX-based deep learning cluster to train on large, high-resolution images that...

The correct solution is a high-performance parallel file system connected through InfiniBand or high-speed Ethernet. Large image training workloads can generate heavy concurrent reads from many GPU nodes, especially when datasets cannot be cached locally. If storage cannot deliver enough per-node and aggregate throughput, GPUs wait for input data and overall training efficiency drops. A parallel file system is designed to distribute metadata and data access across multiple storage servers, allowing many DGX nodes to read training data concurrently. Using InfiniBand or 40/100GbE provides the network bandwidth needed to avoid storage becoming the limiting factor. Expanding local RAID-0 cache may help some repeated reads, but it does not solve shared dataset access or scale well across many nodes. A single NFS server on 10GbE is likely to bottleneck under concurrent multi-node training. General object storage is useful for capacity and cloud-style workflows, but it is not always optimal for high-throughput POSIX-style training access. For DGX cluster optimization, storage must be sized for sustained throughput, metadata operations, and concurrent GPU consumption.