Weekend Sale Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: ac4s65

MWB operates serviced offices in central London.

MWB operates serviced offices in central London. Rock entered a contractual licence with MWB to occupy office space in Marble Arch and had accumulated licence fees in arrears. The original licence agreement contained a ‘No Oral Modification’ clause that said: 'All variations to this licence must be agreed, set out in writing and signed on behalf of both parties before they take effect'.

After 6 months, Rock director re-negotiated to extend payment period over phone call and MWB credit controller agreed his proposal. Is this agreement considered as an effective variation to the original licence agreement?

A.

Yes, because parties who agree to altering the original contract orally despite a ‘No Oral.

B.

Modification’ clause, must have intended to dispense with the clause

C.

No, because the mechanism for variation has been set out in the original contract

D.

Yes, because the credit controller had agreed with Rock director’s proposal

E.

No, because Rock director assumed that the variation was effective and convinced credit controller to believe it

L4M3 PDF/Engine
  • Printable Format
  • Value of Money
  • 100% Pass Assurance
  • Verified Answers
  • Researched by Industry Experts
  • Based on Real Exams Scenarios
  • 100% Real Questions
buy now L4M3 pdf
Get 65% Discount on All Products, Use Coupon: "ac4s65"