Michelle contacts Hannah and asks her if she would be interested in purchasing her car...

To solve the question, you must distinguish the following notion:

- Offer: The case of Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 1 WLR 1403 outlines that an offer is: An expression of willingness to contract on specified terms, with the intention that it is to be binding once accepted

- Acceptance: in order for a contract to be formed, the offer must be accepted. Acceptance represents the meeting of the minds of the parties to the contract – both agree to exchange something for the other (payment, services, goods, etc.).

- Counter offer: is an offer made in response to a prior offer.

- Invitation to treat: An important distinction to make in contract law is that between an offer and an invitation to treat. An invitation to treat is usually an invitation for another party to make an offer. It may also be defined as an indication that a party is open to negotiation.

Here are some key distinctions of offers and invitation to treats.

Offer:

* Certain promise to be bound

* Clear and specified terms

* The conduct or words of the party show certainty

* There is no room for negotiation

Invitation to treat:

* There is room for negotiation

* There is an invitation for offers

* There is a request for information

* Lack of certainty

In the scenario above, initially Michelle just gives an invitation to treat because she is asking whether Hannah is interested to buy her car (request for information from Hannah). Hannah may reject or go into a negotiation with Michelle. Then, Hannah makes an offer by taking the money andshows her intention to be legally bound. At this point, when Hannah's offer is present, Michelle can accept or reject. When she rejects, the contract is not formed. The answer must be "No, because Michelle has rejected Hannah's offer on buying the car".