Comprehensive Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation with All Juniper Security References
Understanding the Problem:
A CoS-based VPN has been configured but is not functioning correctly.
The exhibit shows that under the class-of-service configuration, six forwarding classes are defined.
Forwarding Classes in the Exhibit:
best-effort
ef-class
af-class
network-control
res-class
web-data
Juniper CoS-Based VPN Limitations:
Maximum Number of Forwarding Classes: In CoS-based VPNs (Layer 3 VPNs), there is a limitation on the number of forwarding classes that can be used.
Supported Forwarding Classes: Only up to four forwarding classes are supported in an L3VPN for CoS purposes.
[Reference:, Juniper Networks Documentation:, "For Layer 3 VPNs, the maximum number of forwarding classes supported is four. If you configure more than four forwarding classes, CoS functionality might not work as expected.", Source: Juniper TechLibrary - Class of Service Limitations in VPNs, Explanation:, Issue Identification:, The VPN is not functioning correctly because it exceeds the maximum number of supported forwarding classes for a CoS-based VPN., Solution:, Option D: You must delete one forwarding class., By reducing the number of forwarding classes to four or fewer, the CoS-based VPN will comply with the limitations and function correctly., Why Other Options Are Incorrect:, Option A: You must change the loss priorities of the forwarding classes to low., Changing loss priorities does not affect the limitation on the number of forwarding classes., The issue is not related to loss priority settings but to the number of forwarding classes., Option B: You must change the code point for the DB-data forwarding class to 10000., There is no forwarding class named DB-data in the exhibit., Changing a code point does not address the issue of exceeding the maximum number of forwarding classes., Option C: You must use inet precedence instead of DSCP., Switching from DSCP to IP Precedence does not resolve the issue of having too many forwarding classes., The limitation on the number of forwarding classes remains the same regardless of the classification method used., Conclusion:, To resolve the issue with the CoS-based VPN not functioning correctly due to exceeding the maximum number of forwarding classes, you must delete forwarding classes to reduce the total number to four or fewer., Answer: D. You must delete one forwarding class., , Additional References:, Juniper TechLibrary:, "Configuring Class of Service for MPLS VPNs" - Discusses CoS considerations and limitations in MPLS L3VPN deployments., Source: Juniper TechLibrary - CoS for VPNs, Juniper Networks Day One Book:, "Deploying MPLS Layer 3 VPNs" - Provides insights into CoS limitations and best practices for VPN deployments., ]
