Transfer pricing regulations aim to prevent tax evasion and ensure that intercompany transactions reflect fair market value, preventing profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions. Selling inventory at fair value (arm’s length price) aligns with regulatory requirements, reducing the risk of non-compliance.
(A) Correct – The organization sells inventory to an overseas subsidiary at fair value.
Ensuring that transactions reflect fair market value prevents regulatory violations.
Adhering to the arm’s length principle minimizes transfer pricing risks and potential tax penalties.
(B) Incorrect – The local subsidiary purchases inventory at a discounted price.
A discounted price could be seen as an attempt to shift profits between entities, increasing regulatory scrutiny.
(C) Incorrect – The organization sells inventory to an overseas subsidiary at the original cost.
Selling at the original cost does not account for market conditions, potential markup, and fair valuation.
Regulators may view this as non-compliance with the arm’s length principle.
(D) Incorrect – The local subsidiary purchases inventory at the depreciated cost.
Depreciated cost may not represent fair market value and could be interpreted as a tax avoidance mechanism.
IIA’s Global Internal Audit Standards – Compliance with Tax and Transfer Pricing Regulations
Emphasizes fair pricing in intercompany transactions to prevent regulatory violations.
OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines
Reinforces the arm’s length principle as the standard for pricing related-party transactions.
COSO’s ERM Framework – Compliance Risk Management
Highlights the need for adherence to tax laws and fair-value pricing in financial transactions.
Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References and Internal Auditing Standards:
