Mike is an OACETT C.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In this scenario, Mike is a Certified Technician (C.Tech.) working in a municipal government infrastructure department. As a professional under the Ontario Association of Certified Engineering Technicians and Technologists (OACETT), he is required to adhere to the Code of Ethics and Professional Practice Guidelines.

Ethical and Professional Responsibility:

Public Safety and Welfare:

OACETT’s Code of Ethics explicitly states that certified members must prioritize public welfare and safety over financial or business interests.

The design flaw in the water catchment system makes the area highly susceptible to flooding during severe rainfall, which presents a safety hazard for the community.

Professional Responsibility and Accountability:

As a C.Tech., Mike has a duty to identify and report deficiencies in engineering designs that could result in public harm.

By stamping the flawed design, Mike would be accepting responsibility for a system that he knows is inadequate, which could lead to legal liability, professional discipline, or reputational damage.

Consequences of Stamping the Design:

If Mike proceeds with stamping the design despite knowing its flaws, he could face disciplinary action from OACETT.

The correct answer, B, indicates that the developer (or another stakeholder) could file a professional practice complaint against him with OACETT.

OACETT may then conduct an investigation under its disciplinary procedures, which could result in penalties such as:

Reprimand or Suspension of Certification

Revocation of Membership

Fines or Other Professional Sanctions

Analysis of Incorrect Options:

Option A (Incorrect):

There is a professional practice issue because stamping a flawed design that compromises public safety violates OACETT's ethical and professional standards.

Option C (Incorrect):

While the manager may value Mike’s decision to comply, supporting a flawed design does not align with professional integrity.

Promotions should be based on ethical and competent practice, not on avoiding conflicts with developers.

Option D (Incorrect):

The question does not mention solar panel installation.

Additional technical courses are not an appropriate consequence in this case, as the issue is not a lack of technical expertise but an ethical and professional responsibility failure.

References to Certified Engineering Technologist (CET) Objectives and Documents:

OACETT Code of Ethics: “Members shall regard the welfare of the public, the environment, and the employer as paramount.”

Professional Misconduct under the Ontario Professional Engineers Act and OACETT Bylaws: Stamping or approving a flawed design knowingly can be considered negligence or professional misconduct.

Risk Management in Engineering Practice: Ethical engineers and technologists must identify risks and ensure that public safety concerns are addressed, regardless of business pressures.

By refusing to stamp the design, Mike upholds his professional integrity and protects public safety, fulfilling his ethical obligations as a Certified Technician.