A storage administrator has presented VMFS datastores from a FlashArray with 10TB of raw capacity.

On a Pure Storage FlashArray, " System Space " is a specific GUI-reported metric. Purity has a predefined, hidden internal space budget—typically around 20% of the raw mapped capacity (which would be 2TB on a 10TB array)—reserved for internal array operations. This budget covers RAID/parity overhead, metadata, and reclaimable space (data from deleted volumes, snapshots, or overwritten blocks that are waiting for the backend garbage collection process to fully erase them from the flash chips).

Normally, this internal overhead stays below the 20% budget, and " System Space " displays as 0.00 in the GUI. However, if an administrator deletes a massive amount of data at once, causing the reclaimable space to exceed that 2TB budget, the overflow is prominently displayed in the GUI as " System Space. "

Here is why the other options are incorrect:

Virtual machines have not yet issued an unmap command (A): If a VMware VM deletes a file but the OS hasn ' t issued an UNMAP/TRIM command, the FlashArray is completely unaware that the data was deleted. Therefore, the array continues to report that capacity as standard Volume Space , not System Space.

More than 2TB of volume snapshots were destroyed (C): While destroying snapshots leads to reclaimable space, " reclaimable space " (Option B) is the specific, correct Purity architectural term and metric that the system uses to calculate the internal budget threshold.