A customer that produces video media content needs to replace their multi-rack HDD-based storage array...

For a customer producing video media content and needing a cost-effective solution to replace their multi-rack HDD-based storage array for video archiving, the best choice isFlashArray//C.

Why This Matters:

FlashArray//Cis designed for capacity-optimized workloads, making it ideal for use cases like video archiving, backups, and large-scale data repositories.

It offers high-density storage with QLC flash technology, which provides a balance of performance and cost-effectiveness for less performance-intensive workloads.

Compared to HDD-based systems, FlashArray//C delivers faster access times, lower latency, and improved reliability, all at a lower cost per terabyte than higher-performance arrays like FlashArray//X or //XL.

Why Not the Other Options?

A. FlashArray//X:

FlashArray//X is optimized for high-performance workloads, such as databases and mission-critical applications. While it offers exceptional performance, it is more expensive and not the most cost-effective solution for video archiving.

B. FlashArray//XL:

FlashArray//XL is designed for extreme-scale workloads requiring massive performance and capacity. It is overkill for video archiving and would significantly increase costs without providing proportional benefits.

Key Points:

FlashArray//C:Designed for capacity-optimized workloads, offering a cost-effective solution for video archiving.

QLC Flash Technology:Provides high density and reliability at a lower cost per terabyte compared to traditional HDDs or higher-performance flash arrays.

Cost Efficiency:Balances performance and cost, making it ideal for large-scale, less performance-intensive workloads like video media archives.

References:

Pure Storage FlashArray//C Documentation: "Use Cases for FlashArray//C"

Pure Storage Whitepaper: "Optimizing Storage Costs with FlashArray//C"

Pure Storage Knowledge Base: "Choosing the Right FlashArray Model for Your Workload"