A set of servers is used for an FTP application as well as an HTTP...

Similar to the logic required for managing multi-service backend environments, the issue described—where servers hosting multiple protocols like FTP and HTTP are experiencing uneven distribution—stems from the BIG-IP's default behavior of treating each pool independently. If the administrator uses a member-based load balancing method, the BIG-IP distributes HTTP traffic regardless of how much FTP traffic that same physical server is currently processing.

To resolve this, the administrator must utilize the Least Connections (Node) method. By switching both the HTTP and FTP pools to this algorithm, the BIG-IP begins to make load balancing decisions based on the total combined connection count for the IP address of each server. When a new HTTP request arrives, the BIG-IP checks which server has the fewest total connections (including existing FTP sessions). This prevents a server that is already busy with long-lived FTP transfers from being overwhelmed by a sudden burst of HTTP requests.

Ratio methods (Options A and C) are static and rely on the administrator manually assigning weights to servers based on their perceived capacity; they do not adapt to real-time fluctuations in traffic volume across different pools. Least Connections (Member) (Option B) remains blind to the "cross-pool" traffic on the same hardware. Only the Node-based Least Connections approach provides the global visibility necessary to "even out" the total resource utilization across servers supporting multiple distinct applications.