You have an Azure Databricks workspace named Workspace! that uses a Git repository.

The correct answer is D — apply the main branch changes to Branch1 and resolve the conflicts.

When a merge fails due to conflicts, the right workflow is to bring main's changes into the feature branch, resolve conflicts there, and then merge the clean feature branch into main. This is the standard Git conflict resolution pattern — resolve in the feature branch, not in main — because it protects the main branch from partial or broken states during resolution.

Option A (clone Branch1 as a new repository) creates a disconnected copy; it doesn't resolve the conflict and breaks the relationship with the remote. Option B (apply changes directly to main) bypasses the feature branch entirely and risks overwriting the other developer's work. Option C (clone main as a new repository) again creates a disconnected copy — none of Branch1's changes would be incorporated, and history would be lost.