During an investigation, an analyst finds that the system prompt was maliciously modified to include...

Basic Concept: System prompt injection — where an unauthorized party modifies the AI system ' s core instructions — represents a serious integrity attack. Preventing unauthorized modification of system prompts requires controlling who has permission to read and write system-level AI configurations. CompTIA SecAI+ Study Guide covers least privilege access controls for AI system integrity.

Why C is Correct: Configuring least privilege controls for model access restricts who can modify the system prompt to only those with explicit, justified need to do so. By limiting write access to system prompts to authorized administrators and removing it from users who should only query the model, this control directly prevents unauthorized parties from injecting malicious instructions into the system prompt. Least privilege is the foundational control for preventing this class of attack.

Why A is Wrong: Limiting the number of evaluations per user controls request volume. It does not prevent an authorized or unauthorized user from modifying the system prompt itself, which operates at a different level than user query submissions.

Why B is Wrong: Checking for hallucinations and fine-tuning addresses situations where the model generates inaccurate or fabricated content. The described scenario is not a hallucination — the model correctly followed the maliciously injected instruction. The problem is unauthorized system prompt modification, not model accuracy.

Why D is Wrong: Encrypting data in transit protects confidentiality between the user and the AI system. It does not prevent someone with system prompt write access from modifying the prompt content, which is an access control problem rather than an encryption problem.