The correct answer is D because random-looking DNS requests can indicate malware using a domain generation algorithm (DGA) for command-and-control, but the analyst should first validate the suspicious domains using threat intelligence or reputation sources. The scenario asks what should be done first to determine whether Host X has been compromised, so enrichment and validation of the domain indicators is the best first step.
Exact supporting extract: the All-in-One CySA+ guide explains that malware may use DGAs for command-and-control exchanges and that high-entropy domains often look like gibberish to humans. It also warns that DGAs may have legitimate uses in content delivery networks, so additional analysis is needed to reduce false positives.
The same guide defines a DGA as a threat actor technique used to generate domain names rapidly using seemingly random but predictable processes so malware can eventually connect with command-and-control infrastructure.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A is incorrect because allowing the domains before validation may permit command-and-control or data exfiltration.
B is incorrect because reinstalling the software does not determine whether the DNS domains are malicious or legitimate.
C is incorrect because blocking all outbound connections is a containment action, not the best first investigative step.
D is correct because threat intelligence helps validate whether the suspicious domains are known malicious infrastructure or legitimate generated domains.
