Which of the following is MOST important when discussing risk within an organization?
A.
Adopting a common risk taxonomy
B.
Using key performance indicators (KPIs)
C.
Creating a risk communication policy
D.
Using key risk indicators (KRIs)
The Answer Is:
A
This question includes an explanation.
Explanation:
A common risk taxonomy is a framework that defines and categorizes the sources, types, and impacts of risks within an organization1. It helps to establish a consistent and shared understanding of risk across the organization, and to facilitate effective risk identification, assessment, reporting, and communication2. A common risk taxonomy also enables comparison and aggregation of risks at different levels and domains, and supports alignment of risk management with business objectives and strategies3. Using key performance indicators (KPIs) and key risk indicators (KRIs) are important for measuring and monitoring risk and performance, but they are not the most important factor when discussing risk within an organization. KPIs and KRIs should be derived from the common risk taxonomy and aligned with theorganization’s riskappetite and tolerance4. Creating a risk communication policy is also important for ensuring that risk information is communicated to the right stakeholders at the right time and in the right format, but it is not the most important factor either. A risk communication policy should be based on the common risk taxonomy and the risk roles and responsibilities within the organization5. References = Risk and Information Systems Control Study Manual, Chapter 1: IT Risk Identification, Section 1.2: Risk Taxonomy, pp. 25-29.
CRISC PDF/Engine
Printable Format
Value of Money
100% Pass Assurance
Verified Answers
Researched by Industry Experts
Based on Real Exams Scenarios
100% Real Questions
Get 60% Discount on All Products,
Use Coupon: "8w52ceb345"