Implementing best practice guidelines in a clinical setting like the emergency department (ED) requires a leadership style that balances collaboration with effective decision-making to ensure physician buy-in and sustainable change.
Option A (Laissez-faire): This hands-off style allows autonomy but lacks structure, making it ineffective for guiding physicians toward specific guidelines.
Option B (Autocratic): Autocratic leadership imposes decisions, which may resist physician engagement and hinder adoption of guidelines in a collaborative setting like the ED.
Option C (Participatory): This is the correct answer. The NAHQ CPHQ study guide states, “Participatory leadership involves engaging stakeholders in decision-making while maintaining direction, making it effective for implementing clinical guidelines by fostering buy-in and collaboration” (Domain 3). In the ED, involving physicians in developing and refining the plan ensures acceptance and adherence.
Option D (Democratic): Democratic leadership emphasizes equal voting, which may slow decisions in a time-sensitive clinical context, making it less effective than participatory leadership.
CPHQ Objective Reference: Domain 3: Organizational Leadership, Objective 3.2, “Apply leadership styles to quality initiatives,” emphasizes participatory leadership for clinical change. The NAHQ study guide notes, “Participatory leadership is ideal for engaging clinicians in guideline implementation to ensure commitment” (Domain 3).
Rationale: Participatory leadership fosters physician engagement while maintaining focus on best practice guidelines, aligning with CPHQ’s collaborative leadership principles.
[Reference: NAHQ CPHQ Study Guide, Domain 3: Organizational Leadership, Objective 3.2., , , ]
