The best action to address the situation of the risk committee being overwhelmed by the number of false positives in risk reports is to evaluate key risk indicators (KRIs). KRIs are metrics that measure the likelihood and impact of IT-related risks on the enterprise’s objectives and goals. Evaluating KRIs can help the risk committee to identify and prioritize the most significant and relevant risks, as well as to adjust the thresholds or values that trigger the risk alerts or warnings. Evaluating KRIs can also help reduce the number of false positives, which are the cases where the risk reports indicate a high level of risk, but the actual risk is low or negligible. Reducing false positives can help improve the accuracy and reliability of risk reports, as well as save time and resources for the risk committee.
Conducting a risk assessment, changing the reporting format, and adjusting the IT balanced scorecard are also possible actions to take to address the situation of the risk committee being overwhelmed by false positives, but they are not the best action. Conducting a risk assessment is a process that involves identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating the IT risks that may affect the enterprise’s objectives and operations. Conducting a risk assessment can help update and validate the risk information and data, as well as implement appropriate controls and mitigation strategies. However, conducting a risk assessment may not be sufficient or feasible to address the issue of false positives, as it may require a lot of time and effort, and it may not address the root causes of false positives, such as inaccurate or outdated KRIs. Changing the reporting format is a measure that involves modifying or improving the way that risk information and data are presented or communicated in risk reports. Changing the reporting format can help enhance and simplify the readability and usability of risk reports, as well as highlight or emphasize the key points or findings. However, changing the reporting format may not solve the problem of false positives, as it may only affect the appearance or style of risk reports, not their content or quality. Adjusting the IT balanced scorecard is a task that involves revising or updating the metrics that track the performance of IT in relation to the enterprise’s vision, strategy, and goals. Adjusting the IT balanced scorecard can help evaluate and communicate the effectiveness and efficiency of IT operations, services, and projects, as well as their contribution to customer satisfaction, business value, and innovation. However, adjusting the IT balancedscorecard may not directly address the issue of false positives, as it may focus on different aspects or dimensions of IT performance than KRIs.
