Amanda works for a government contractor.

The correct answer is A. Whistleblower anti-retaliation laws protect employees from being punished because they engaged in protected reporting activity. They do not generally give the employee immunity for separate misconduct. If Amanda reported suspected false claims to the government, that report can qualify as protected whistleblowing. However, if the employer later discovers that Amanda misappropriated more than $150,000, the employer can generally terminate her for that independent misconduct, so long as the termination is based on the theft and not as retaliation for the report.

Option B is incorrect because whistleblower status does not prevent termination for legitimate, nonretaliatory reasons. Option C is incorrect because terminating Amanda for making the report would be exactly the kind of retaliatory conduct anti-retaliation rules are designed to prohibit. Option D is therefore also incorrect. In CFE terms, the key distinction is between protected activity and independent grounds for discipline. Employers usually remain free to discipline or dismiss a whistleblower for fraud, theft, performance failures, or other valid reasons unrelated to the protected disclosure. Therefore, the legally correct statement is that the employer can terminate Amanda for misappropriating funds. General ACFE materials on whistleblower protections likewise emphasize protection from retaliation, not immunity from consequences for unrelated wrongdoing.