Pre-Winter Sale Special Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: ac4s65

The engineering lead at Trenova Systems, Inc.

Anthropic CCAR-P Full Course Access
Anthropic CCAR-P View All Questions

The engineering lead at Trenova Systems, Inc. is evaluating two proposals for improving developer workflows using Claude-assisted tooling. Proposal A adds Claude Code to the IDE for inline code generation and review. Proposal B routes all code-generation requests through a shared Slack bot without IDE integration.

Which two observations most accurately evaluate these proposals against workflow-improvement objectives? (Select two.)

A.

Proposal B is superior because centralizing requests in Slack creates an auditable log of all code-generation activity.

B.

Proposal B introduces workflow friction by requiring developers to leave the IDE, undermining the productivity objective.

C.

Proposal A reduces context switching by providing AI assistance at the point of development without requiring a separate tool.

D.

Proposal B improves workflow velocity because Slack notifications create an asynchronous review queue.

E.

Both proposals are equivalent because the model capabilities are identical regardless of the integration point.

CCAR-P PDF/Engine
  • Printable Format
  • Value of Money
  • 100% Pass Assurance
  • Verified Answers
  • Researched by Industry Experts
  • Based on Real Exams Scenarios
  • 100% Real Questions
buy now CCAR-P pdf
Get 65% Discount on All Products, Use Coupon: "ac4s65"
Next
A research summarization assistant has been deployed for six months.
You are defining transparency practices for a customer-facing assistant whose responses are materially shaped by...
Previous