Pre-Winter Sale Special Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: ac4s65

An engineering organization is adopting Claude Code across 200 developers.

Anthropic CCAR-P Full Course Access
Anthropic CCAR-P View All Questions

An engineering organization is adopting Claude Code across 200 developers. A team lead proposes that AI-generated pull requests bypass standard code review for changes under 50 lines because small changes are considered low risk and review capacity is constrained.

Which two Diligence-competency objections should you raise? (Select two.)

Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

A.

Removing review eliminates the verification mechanism required for AI-generated output across the workflow.

B.

Code-review capacity should be expanded to handle every code change submitted across the team.

C.

The threshold should be increased to 200 lines to capture more changes.

D.

AI-generated pull requests should be rejected by default across the organization.

E.

Line count is a poor proxy for the actual risk introduced by a code change.

CCAR-P PDF/Engine
  • Printable Format
  • Value of Money
  • 100% Pass Assurance
  • Verified Answers
  • Researched by Industry Experts
  • Based on Real Exams Scenarios
  • 100% Real Questions
buy now CCAR-P pdf
Get 65% Discount on All Products, Use Coupon: "ac4s65"
Next
You are compiling team-setup practices for a Claude Code rollout across an engineering organization.
A Claude architect is implementing safety controls for a customer-facing advice assistant that must never...
Previous