Given the requirements:To integrate with an external web service using HTTP requestsTo create a service...

To integrate with an external web service using HTTP requests and set up a testing mechanism using the Service Framework in Salesforce B2C Commerce, the best approach is to implement the mockFill callback and set the service mode to "mock". This configuration allows the developer to test the integration with a simulated response from the service. By using the mockFill method, developers can specify the expected response from the external service when it is not yet available. This approach is particularly useful for testing and debugging the integration in a controlled environment before the actual web service goes live. Setting the service mode to "mock" enables this simulated environment, ensuring that the service behaves as if it is interacting with the actual external service.

QUESTIONNO: 67

A developer needs to update the package.json file so that it points to the hock file for a cartridge, using the hooks keyword. Which snippets work correctly when added to the file?:

A. { “hooks”: “./cartridge/scripts/hooks.json” }

B. { “hooks”: “./scripts/hooks.json” }

C. { hooks: “./cartridge/scripts/hooks.json” }

D. { hooks: ./scripts/hooks.json }

Answer: A

In the context of Salesforce B2C Commerce Cloud, particularly when configuring hooks in a package.json file for a cartridge, the correct format to specify the location of the hooks configuration file must be a valid JSON string. The snippet { "hooks": "./cartridge/scripts/hooks.json" } is correctly formatted as it includes double quotes around both the key and the value, which is a requirement in JSON syntax. The path ./cartridge/scripts/hooks.json correctly assumes that the hooks configuration file is located within a cartridge in the scripts directory, which is a common setup in SFCC. This matches best practices as documented in the Salesforce Commerce Cloud Script API documentation and developer guides.