A team of scientists wants to understand the relationship between smoking and lung cancer.

This is an observational study because the scientists collect existing information about individuals’ smoking habits and lung cancer diagnoses without assigning treatments or controlling exposure. In an experimental study, researchers impose a condition, treatment, or intervention and then measure the resulting effect. Here, the researchers are not requiring some individuals to smoke and others not to smoke; they are simply recording naturally occurring characteristics and outcomes. The purpose is to examine association, or correlation, between two variables: smoking status and lung cancer diagnosis. Both variables are categorical, so the analysis would likely involve proportions, conditional percentages, or contingency tables. Option A is incorrect because analyzing correlations does not make a study experimental. Option B is incorrect because “testing effects” would require manipulation or assignment. Option C identifies a true feature, a large sample size, but sample size does not determine study type. References/topics from the Study Guide: observational studies, experimental studies, association, categorical variables.

============