To comply with the company's security policy, which restricts each team to access data for only their own customers, creating an Amazon Bedrock custom service role for each team is the correct solution.
Custom Service Role Per Team:
A custom service role for each team ensures that the access control is granular, allowing only specific teams to access their own customer data in Amazon S3.
This setup aligns with the principle of least privilege, ensuring teams can only interact with data they are authorized to access.
Why Option A is Correct:
Access Control: Allows precise access permissions for each team's data.
Security Compliance: Directly meets the company's security policy requirements by ensuring data segregation.
Why Other Options are Incorrect:
B. Custom service role with customer name specification: This approach is impractical as it relies on manual input, which is prone to errors and does not inherently enforce data access controls.
C. Redacting personal data and updating S3 bucket policy: Redaction does not solve the requirement for team-specific access, and updating bucket policies is less granular than creating roles.
D. One Bedrock role with full S3 access and IAM roles for teams: This setup does not meet the least privilege principle, as having a single role with full access is contrary to the company's security policy.
Thus, A is the correct answer to meet the company's security requirements.
