Refer to the exhibit.

The correct answer is D. From the exhibit, N5K-1 has interface Vlan100 in VRF WEB with IP 10.1.1.1/24 for Server 1’s gateway, and interface Vlan150 in VRF WEB with IP 192.168.1.1/30 toward N5K-2. On N5K-2, interface Vlan200 has IP 172.16.1.1/24 for Server 2’s gateway, and interface Vlan150 has IP 192.168.1.2/30 as the routed transit link back to N5K-1. The exhibit also shows that N5K-2 already has a static route pointing to Server 1’s host/subnet via 192.168.1.1, but N5K-1 only has a route for 172.16.1.0 that is not placed in VRF WEB. Because Server 1’s SVI belongs to VRF WEB, N5K-1 needs a route inside that same VRF toward Server 2’s subnet through 192.168.1.2. Without that VRF-specific route, traffic sourced from Server 1 cannot be forwarded correctly to Server 2. The other options do not solve the Layer 3 reachability problem between the two VRF-connected subnets.