Which advanced session-hijacking technique is hardest to detect and mitigate?
A.
Covert XSS attack
B.
Man-in-the-Browser (MitB) attack
C.
Passive sniffing on Wi-Fi
D.
Session fixation
The Answer Is:
B
This question includes an explanation.
Explanation:
CEH v13 identifies Man-in-the-Browser (MitB) attacks as one of the most dangerous and difficult-to-detect session hijacking techniques, especially in online banking environments. In MitB attacks, malware operates inside the user’s browser, intercepting and manipulating transactions in real time.
Unlike XSS or session fixation attacks, MitB bypasses server-side security controls entirely. Even strong encryption, multi-factor authentication, and secure cookies are ineffective because the attack occurs after authentication, within a trusted session.
Passive sniffing is limited by encryption, and session fixation relies on poor session management. Covert XSS requires injection points and is more easily mitigated.
CEH v13 emphasizes that MitB attacks can modify transaction details without user awareness, making detection extremely difficult. Therefore, Option B is correct.
312-50v13 PDF/Engine
Printable Format
Value of Money
100% Pass Assurance
Verified Answers
Researched by Industry Experts
Based on Real Exams Scenarios
100% Real Questions
Get 65% Discount on All Products,
Use Coupon: "ac4s65"