An organization is preparing to establish an in-house eDiscovery team to handle the identification, collection,...

Option A is the best answer because it directly matches CHFI v11’s treatment of Legal and IT Team Considerations for eDiscovery , the EDRM Cycle , eDiscovery collections/methodologies , and the need to manage evidence in a way that is both technically sound and legally defensible .

The IT team plays the primary role in ensuring that electronically stored information is identified, preserved, and collected without altering or damaging the evidence. That supports integrity, authenticity, and forensic soundness . The legal team, by contrast, ensures that collection scope, process, privacy considerations, and production decisions comply with the applicable rules so the evidence remains admissible and usable in court . CHFI stresses both the legal and technical dimensions of digital evidence handling, especially in eDiscovery contexts.

Option B is too narrow and misstates the legal team’s role. C focuses on analysis rather than the stated primary benefit. D reverses the responsibilities. Therefore, the core advantage of involving both teams is that IT preserves evidentiary integrity while legal protects admissibility and compliance .