Which statement describe the difference between OpenConfig and native YANG data models?
A.
Native models are designed to be independent of the underlying platform and are developed by vendors and standards bodies, such as the IETF.
B.
Native models are developed by individual developers and designed to apply configurations on platforms.
C.
OpenConfig models are developed by vendors and designed to integrate to features or configurations that are relevant only to that platform.
D.
Native models are developed by vendors and designed to integrate to features or configurations that are relevant only to that platform.
The Answer Is:
D
This question includes an explanation.
Explanation:
The difference between OpenConfig and native YANG data models lies in their development and purpose:
D: Native models are developed by vendors and are specific to their platforms. They are designed to integrate features or configurations that are relevant only to that vendor’s platform. Native models, being vendor-specific, provide the most detailed and granular control over the vendor’s devices1.
OpenConfig models, on the other hand, are developed by a collaborative group of network operators and are intended to be vendor-neutral. They aim to provide a more standardized model that can be used across different vendors’ equipment, focusing on the needs of the operators rather than the specific capabilities of the devices1.
References:
Cisco Blogs on YANG models1
CBT Nuggets on Native YANG models2
Introduction to YANG - LTRSDN-2260
300-435 PDF/Engine
Printable Format
Value of Money
100% Pass Assurance
Verified Answers
Researched by Industry Experts
Based on Real Exams Scenarios
100% Real Questions
Get 60% Discount on All Products,
Use Coupon: "8w52ceb345"