As a Cloud Native developer, you develop two services in Node.

Explanation

The best answer is: "Use the OCI Logging service and enable VCN flow logs." To meet the requirement of analyzing network communication between two services deployed in different Container Engine for Kubernetes (OKE) clusters within the same Virtual Cloud Network (VCN) in a cost-effective way, you can use the OCI Logging service and enable VCN flow logs. The VCN flow logs feature in OCI allows you to capture and log network traffic information for your VCN resources. By enabling VCN flow logs, you can monitor and analyze the network communication between your services without the need for additional third-party logging services or tools. Enabling VCN flow logs provides visibility into the network traffic, including source and destination IP addresses, ports, protocols, and other relevant details. This information can be collected and stored in the OCI Logging service, where you can analyze and gain insights into the network communication patterns between your services. By leveraging the built-in capabilities of the OCI Logging service and enabling VCN flow logs, you can fulfill the security team's requirement for network communication analysis in a cost-effective manner. This eliminates the need for deploying additional third-party logging services or tools, reducing complexity and potential costs associated with their setup and maintenance. The other options mentioned are not the most cost-effective or suitable solutions for analyzing network communication in this scenario: Deploying a third-party logging service and aggregating the network flow logs would introduce additional costs and complexity, which may not be necessary considering the built-in capabilities provided by OCI. Rewriting the application to send logs to an outside log aggregator would not directly address the requirement of analyzing network communication between the services. It would focus more on application-level logs rather than network-level analysis. Deploying Wireshark and intercepting packets would require additional infrastructure setup and maintenance, which may not be the most cost-effective approach for network analysis in this scenario.